The short answer to the title question is “no.”
End Date: Saturday Feb-1-2020 22:46:58 PST
Buy It Now for only: $4.99
Buy It Now | Add to watch list
End Date: Wednesday Feb-26-2020 16:31:41 PST
Buy It Now for only: $3.75
Buy It Now | Add to watch list
This is not a surprise, if we consider some obvious drawbacks of this programming language, including IEEE 754 Double Precision, the fact that a number of functions and properties tend to be executed differently across browsers, aggressive coercion, and problematic global variables (to name just a few).
From my point of view, what’s not to love about a programming language that allows for autocomplete, rollover, and dropdown menu effects, animating different elements on a page, and playing audio and video among many other cool features responsible for rich customer experiences?
Besides, we’re talking about an evergreen language compatible with many other languages, and this versatility is extremely important.
- It’s the only de-facto option when it comes to front-end development and client-side interface, as it allows programmers to create all kinds of interactive elements and dynamic web pages;
- It’s prototype-oriented;
- It’s weakly typed, which makes the code comparatively obscure;
- The code has to be tested on different browsers before publishing because it won’t execute in the same way on every browser;
- The lack of debugging makes it difficult for developers to spot a problem.
Still, one of the most beneficial features of this JS alternative lies in the fact that it allows you to go beyond client-side development and create standalone applications. With Google’s UI toolkit, it’s possible to build native web, desktop, and mobile apps. However, being new to programmers and not so frequently used in the market, Dart offers limited online resources, meaning that you can’t easily find a solution once you bump into problems.
For example, Angular.js is built entirely in TypeScript.
Another plus of this JS alternative is that it’s compatible with Node.js.
However, the community is smaller and coding in TypeScript requires more time.
With Kaffeine, the process of debugging is much simpler, and besides being easy on developers, this JS extension is also beneficial for the end-user as the browser doesn’t freeze which means that user experience is smooth.
Again, a much smaller community and the lack of resources make this programming language a bit obscure.
Elm is a statically typed functional language that bears more similarity to Haskell than C, but unlike the former, it doesn’t leave developers scratching their heads over its complexity.
While coding in Elm, developers get immediate notifications when an error occurs so that they can fix it in a timely manner, which prevents numerous bugs in the later development stages. The tagline that this program uses is “no runtime exceptions in practice” which basically means that if an app written in Elm starts running at all, it will be unlikely to crash.
Some of its downsides include the lack of server-side, a steeper learning curve, and the fact that it’s missing some of the higher-level capabilities.
CoffeeScript is said to improve the readability of the original language as well as simplify code and make it shorter. Its compatibility with Node.js is another advantage.
Featured image via Unsplash.