“I don’t give a flying piston,” was my answer when recently asked for comment on the newly redesigned BMW logo (originally created in 1917). I wasn’t trying to be rude, but during the past few weeks I’ve lost my patience for questions about logo refinements (there are so many these days). What’s more, it was news to me.
End Date: Friday Aug-14-2020 12:03:28 PDT
Buy It Now for only: $9.99
Buy It Now | Add to watch list
End Date: Sunday Aug-30-2020 17:38:20 PDT
Buy It Now for only: $2.50
Buy It Now | Add to watch list
When I learned that BMW had indeed updated its logo for the first time in 23 years (read a history of the mark here), I was uninterested and unmoved despite my own lease of one. However, it’s my job to follow these things, so I read on in Ad Age that the German luxury auto brand “is stopping short of making the change on its vehicles. The update, which began rolling out this week, is for ‘online and offline communication purposes,’ the brand states in a press release, positioning its new look as ‘better-suited to the digital age.’” Then I read this headline on The Verge: “BMW’s new flat logo is everything that’s wrong with modern logo design.”
Everything wrong with modern logo design?!
Really? Read on: “There are two major changes to the updated logo. The first is largely positive: BMW is reverting back to a flatter design that ditches the very dated 3D effects and shading that were introduced in 1997 with a design that resembles the simpler logo the company has been using since 1963. The second change is the removal of the black outer ring in favor of a transparent background, which just looks plain bad.”
The intent, explains the VP responsible for branding, is to “radiate more openness and clarity,” but the effect is anything but, states The Verge, which adds, “it looks nice on BMW’s bronze-hued electric i4 sedan concept, but what about on a white BMW? Or a letterhead? Or on a sign for a BMW dealership on a highway? The effect is less ‘clarity’ and more like someone on the creative team got sloppy and accidentally deleted the background on the Photoshop file before they exported it.”
OK, valid point. But regardless, who really cares? It is, in my humble rack and o-pinion, nothing to drain your battery over. In fact, it’s a business decision that, like so many logo transformations in recent years, we’ll probably get used to, or not—and if not, what difference will it mean? The logo could be embossed white on white, for all I care. Call me indifferent, old fashioned, design illiterate or a traitor to the cause of good design, but despite the fact that I lease one, I care less what the logo looks like than whether or not the car runs well, and the service is top-notch.
Note: I was more perturbed in the early 1960s when Volkswagen eliminated its Wolfsburg hood emblem, which delinquents like me used to pry off as souvenirs and boy scout neckerchief holders.
PRINT is back. And soon, we’ll be relaunching with an all-new look, all-new content and a fresh outlook for the future. Stay tuned.